Common Misconceptions about Employment Screening Service

Published on by Lena Moss

In spite of their significance in the hiring process, employment screening services are frequently subject to myths and misconceptions. A portion of the misconceptions comes from applicants. Others are harbored by employers. Most are due to the lack of fundamental understanding about the nature, process or laws encompassing employment screening services or background checks.

 

 

To wholly realize the significance of employment screening services, it is critical to expose the faulty judgments and understanding around background checks. Here are the most common ones:

 

  • Online Networking Profiles Are Off-Limits For Background Screening - This is a typical misinterpretation particularly among job candidates with upsetting online habits. They expect that scouts won't look at their online networking profiles. Despite the fact that this may have been valid before, employers are presently sensitive about workers' online conduct. They know this can affect their image somehow. As of now, most background checks concentrate on criminal records, education or past employment. However, hiring managers now request that background screening companies sift through candidates' online networking profiles. Any faulty conduct, for example, oppressive or disrespectful posts and foul pictures or recordings can make them rethink their hiring choices.

 

  • A Criminal Record Means an Applicant can't be Hired - Employers as well as job applicants have a tendency to have this misconception. Most hiring specialists think that by having a criminal record, an applicant shouldn't be hired. Most job seekers likewise feel that a criminal record implies they won't get the job. However, this could not be true all the time. For one thing, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) places certain limitations on when criminal records can be utilized to deny employment. One EEOC prerequisite is that the idea of conviction should straightforwardly influence the idea of the occupation. For example, a DUI may exclude somebody applying to be school driver, yet it can't be justification for precluding a future bookkeeper.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To be informed of the latest articles, subscribe:
Comment on this post